Review of the Anniversary Assembly 2022

Now it is over, the glittering festival of science that we were able to celebrate in the splendid atmosphere of the Leipzig Congress Hall at the Zoo. It was four days full of stimulating encounters and events. After a Corona break of more than two years, we were finally able to get together again in person, in keeping with the spirit of our society’s founders.

Prominent speakers and panellists interpreted the theme “Images in science” from their own perspective. It became apparent how interdisciplinary science is and must be today: All sciences strive to create images, and they use artificial as well as natural intelligence, the large toolbox of computer science, sophisticated methods of physics and specially designed building blocks of chemistry to do so. One example: in order to depict the molecules of life ever more precisely, new dyes and labelling strategies, complex light and electron microscopes, efficient algorithms and plausible visualisations are needed.

On the journey through scientific image worlds, we were allowed to participate in technological and content-related breakthroughs, for example in the search for exoplanets, dark matter and black holes, in blazingly fast NMR imaging and light microscopy on the nanometre scale, or in research on individual molecules and atoms.

All the speakers were well prepared, with lectures that were challenging, understandable and often entertaining. And not only for the eight hundred guests in the hall, but also via livestream, Instagram and website diary for many others, as the impressive user numbers show. As soon as the films are edited, you can watch the presentations again on our Youtube channel.

The discussions on the podium were invigorating, opening up other interesting perspectives in addition to the views of individual speakers. For example, during the festive afternoon on the images of Humboldt’s expeditions and research journeys into the deep sea and the universe; then on Sunday on the incipient revolution in RNA medicine.

Around two hundred participants in our student programme brought freshness and new impulses to the discussion. The gratitude of the young people for this unique programme is overwhelming! The guest book also bears witness to happy-go-lucky feedback: “were able to meet great people”, “inspiring insights into cutting-edge research”, “new images – new world view”, “reveling in enthusiasm”, “let the spark fly”, “best conference ever”, “will gladly come again” – these are just a few examples from many handwritten thank-you notes.

Once again, we would like to thank all those who contributed to the success of this celebration: our guests who travelled from near and far, members and non-members, younger and older, all speakers and panellists, all those who helped with the preparation and implementation in the office and board and in the local team of Zoo and Congress Hall around Jörg Junhold, the city of Leipzig and the state of Saxony for their hospitality, the Nikolaikirche with Sebastian Feydt, who reminded us of the peaceful revolution of 1989, and the musicians who took us on an intensive foray through Leipzig’s musical history, the students around Paul Mühlenhoff, the Instagram team from Stuttgart around Alexander Mäder, the archive of the GDNÄ around Matthias Röschner and all exhibitors at the Expo, the authors and the team of the commemorative publication around Lilo Berg and Thomas Liebscher, all sponsors, donors and benefactors.

After the meeting is before the meeting: The next meeting of the GDNÄ will take place in Potsdam in September 2024, then under the leadership of Heribert Hofer. Anke Kaysser-Pyzalla was elected for the presidency in 2025 and 2026, the first female engineer to chair the GDNÄ. So the planning already reaches quite far into the future.

The festive assembly showed that the GDNÄ is needed and has a model for the future that it can further develop and expand: for an intensive dialogue between disciplines, for an invigorating student programme, and for science communication in the best sense!

Martin Lohse, President of the GDNÄ (2019-2022). 

Images from the body, RNA medicine and hands-on science

Last day of the meeting, grand finale and the hour of medicine: In the morning, Professor Jens Frahm from the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Natural Sciences in Göttingen reported on a paradigm shift in medical imaging: real-time magnetic resonance tomography to image the beating heart, blood flow, swallowing and speaking in full dynamics. In the panel on RNA medicine of the future, Professor Stefanie Dimmeler from the University of Frankfurt and Professors Jörg Vogel and Lorenz Meinel from the University of Würzburg presented the fascinating possibilities of ribonucleic acid medicine and discussed what is already feasible today and what is on the horizon for the future. (Report follows)

© GDNÄ

Anke Kaysser-Pyzalla, an engineering scientist, was elected 2nd Vice-President for the years 2023 to 2024 – and thus GDNÄ President 2025 to 2026.

The anniversary conference showed how much physics and technology, biology and medicine are intertwined today, emphasised GDNÄ President Professor Martin Lohse in his farewell speech. He himself was thanked by the next President, Professor Heribert Hofer, for the “outstanding leadership” of the Natural Sciences Society – a task that lasted four years instead of the usual two due to the corona. There was also hearty applause for Katja Diete and Sylvia Landeck from the GDNÄ office for the demanding organisation of the conference. Then a look into the day after tomorrow: Anke Kaysser-Pyzalla, an engineering scientist, accepted the election of the General Assembly and will become GDNÄ President for the years 2025 to 2026. Heribert Hofer invited all friends to the next meeting, which is planned for the second weekend in September 2024 in Potsdam. The crowning conclusion of the meeting was the presentation of the participation certificates to the almost 200 scholarship holders of the student programme. Final realisation of the anniversary days in Leipzig: contrary to some fears, the stage in the beautiful Art Deco congress hall withstood the strain!

© GDNÄ

Excellent organisation and support: The conference team with Katja Diete (second from left) and Sylvia Landeck (third from left).

Of extrasolar planets, luminaries in the making and images from Hollywood

The third day of the conference is dedicated to images from physics, technology and computer science, and in the morning, for example, leads straight into galactic expanses. Professor Heike Rauer, Director of the Institute of Planetary Research at the German Aerospace Centre (DLR), is a convincing and knowledgeable tour guide. Not only does she have a fascinating lecture topic – the diversity of extrasolar planets – she can also convey it in an understandable and inspiring way.

The journey leads beyond the known solar system with its eight planets into extrasolar dimensions, the exploration of which began with the American Voyager probes launched in the 1970s. In 1995, the first extrasolar planet, “51 Pegasus b”, was discovered at the French Haute Provence Observatory. The discovery made headlines worldwide and earned the two researchers, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz, the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2019. 

More than five thousand planets around stars beyond our solar system are now known, says Heike Rauer. “We are the first generation of people to be able to see planets around another star – you have to roll with the punches, that’s just fantastic.” However, she says, this is also accompanied by the realisation that our solar system is perhaps not as unique as was long believed. Rauer: “Of course, it also raises the old human question: Is there life out there? Are we not alone in this world?” 

But how do you manage to take pictures of planets? After all, their stars are millions of times brighter than the satellites. In order to still see something, the light is blocked with blinds, reports Heike Rauer – similar to a person who holds his hand in front of his eyes in bright light. “With the method of coronography we can actually get an image of planets outside the solar system, even if they are only visible as dots due to the great distance. Unfortunately, this is only possible for very few planets so far.” The most successful method at the moment is the so-called photometric transit method: With this method, planets can be discovered as soon as the orbiting planet passes in front of the star as seen from Earth, thereby obscuring it according to its size. 

Satellites serve as observation platforms. The first artificial satellite was launched into space by the French-European CoRoT mission, followed by NASA’s Kepler/K2 and TESS missions and ESA’s CHEOPS and, in the future, PLATO missions.  “The Kepler and TESS missions also have Citizen Science projects,” says Heike Rauer. Fresh data would be put on the web immediately to enable anyone interested, including amateurs, to search for planets. Her colleague discovered “GJ367b” in this data – “an extremely fast, very close to the star and unfortunately uninhabitable planet for humans, which seems to consist mainly of iron.” 

The big goal of their guild, he said, is to find habitable rocky planets. “We discover small planets all the time, but so far, unfortunately, no second Earth – even if that is often suggested in the media.” In order to perhaps one day make a find in the planetary diversity, the time has now come for a large inventory. This is the goal of the ESA space telescope PLATO, whose instrument consortium is headed by Heike Rauer. From the end of 2026, PLATO will search the Milky Way for Earth-like planets, using 26 cameras that can measure the smallest fluctuations in stellar brightness with high precision. Rauer: “This is the largest area of light-sensitive sensors ever built.” Subsequent missions, the plan goes, will study the atmospheres of the Earth-like planets found to find out more about their habitability. 

“What we know today is: the solar system is not the norm, rather we have a lot of diversity out there,” says the astrophysicist. In her discipline, she says, it’s a bit like botany right now, when the first researchers went out into nature to collect and sort plants. Heike Rauer: “We are like children who are amazed and have questions upon questions.”

Five questions for Liv and Finn Hille

At the age of 20, Finn Hille is already an old collegiate. The fifth-semester medical student took part in the student programme in Saarbrücken for the first time in 2018 and, because he enjoyed it so much then, is taking part for the second time in Leipzig. A good twenty other alumni have travelled with him. “Many have come a long way to be here again – that speaks for great enthusiasm,” says the Bonn student.  His sister Liv Hille, 16, is standing next to him. She is a student at the Clara-Schumann-Gymnasium in Bonn and, after her brother had reported so animatedly about his Saarbrücken experience at home, applied directly to the GDNÄ office for a place in this year’s student programme. Liv already has quite clear ideas about her future: “I want to study human medicine, maybe chemistry,” says the young woman. “In any case, I want to become a scientist.” 

How do you like it here at the conference?

Liv: I am very impressed and have great respect for everyone who is presenting here. That’s a feeling you can quickly get as a young person, but here I don’t have to be shy and I can talk to famous scientists. It gives me the courage to become a luminary in a subject myself. Most of the fellow fellows already have their subject specialisations, but everyone is very open and we have lots of good discussions.

Finn: I’m completely blown away by the interdisciplinarity at this meeting. In medicine, many fundamental insights come from the border areas and here I get so many impulses from other fields that I can think about for a long time. What I also particularly like here is the great joy of discourse – among the speakers, the visitors and in the student programme. The GDNÄ is a model for the future, an ideal: this is how science should be. 

The lectures should, according to the goal, be demanding and understandable. Do you succeed in this and what do you do if you don’t understand something directly?

Liv: In some lectures, a great deal of basic knowledge is assumed, which I don’t yet have. When difficulties arise, I try to understand the lecture at least to some extent using the examples that are presented. If that doesn’t work, I concentrate on what I do understand and can often make sense of a lot of other things. I think it’s normal not to understand everything immediately. I then dig in and learn more.

Finn: Of course I come up against limits of understanding in some lectures. Then I do what I do at the university: I take a step back and work my way back along the thread of the lecture to a point where I can pick up again. This is usually possible because the GDNÄ lectures are excellently structured. If the first strategy doesn’t help me, I try to focus on aspects that I can relate to and then look for references to my own subject. 

German is spoken at this conference. What do you think of that?

Liv: For my generation, it makes it easier to access. We all speak English quite well, but in German you get into conversation faster and better.

Finn: I think it’s appropriate for a large scientific nation to hold conferences in the mother tongue and I like to keep up this tradition. It’s a different story for conferences. There it is important that experts from many countries exchange information in one language, which is conveniently English. 

Many generations are represented at the GDNÄ Assembly. What is that like for you?

Liv: It is impressive that many older people come from far away. I find the dialogue between the generations here very successful and enjoy discussing with experienced scientists. For example, I had an interesting conversation about science communication with a geologist in the lecture hall.

Finn: Not only the speakers here have an exciting life story. During the breakfast break, for example, an elderly couple sat down with us. They both come from near Stuttgart, he is a chemist – we were talking about the lecture on biodiversity we all just came from. 

How will the GDNÄ remain attractive in the future?

Finn: I would like the GDNÄ to get more involved in public debates. It has a great responsibility there. I am thinking, for example, of initiatives to prevent infectious diseases that pose a global risk.

Liv: The GDNÄ has so much to say. I’m sure many young people at universities would be enthusiastic to join in. But perhaps the direct invitation is still lacking.

© The Walt Disney Company

Scene from the Disney film “Aladdin” (2019).

Pictures from Hollywood

At the end of the third day of the conference, Professor Markus Gross from ETH Zurich invites the audience to follow him behind the scenes of the film business. He receives enthusiastic applause for his lecture on “Computer Science for Hollywood Pictures”. (report follows)

Of mini-deer, camera traps and new materials

So many exciting lectures in one day, so many nice encounters in the hallway, plus the Market of Science with great exhibits – not so easy to pack everything into one day. That’s why at this point, as yesterday, there are only a few impressions, with a much richer programme in the background. Nut chocolate chips, so to speak, to paraphrase the beautiful concrete comparison made by Jan Wörner yesterday afternoon.

Long preface, here we go: Friday began with a lecture by Dr Andreas Wilting on “Tracking down hidden wildlife of tropical rainforests”. Andreas Wilting is a tropical biologist and researcher at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research in Berlin-Friedrichsfelde. With a view to the conference theme “Science in Pictures”, he first presented his work with camera traps in Leipzig, which allows him completely new insights into the living world of tropical rainforests. “For example, we thought we knew everything about orangutans and were very sure that the animals mainly stay in the treetops.” The camera traps on Borneo, however, showed the researchers led by Andreas Wilting that orangutans often stay on the ground and, as you can see, feel very comfortable there. “Our previous view of the world was not correct,” the 43-year-old admits.

© IZW / Re:wild / SIE / NCNP

Caught on camera: a Vietnamese cantchile.

A few years ago, camera traps also enabled the spectacular rediscovery of a species, the Vietnamese Kanchil. The amazingly small deer species had been thought to be extinct (see interview in the margin column) – the re-encounter made headlines worldwide. 

In a further step, the Berlin researchers combine camera trap data with high-resolution satellite data to create functional maps of species distribution. For example, they were able to show that climate change is already having dire consequences for biodiversity even in the tropics. On Borneo, the method was used to map certain areas that need special protection. 

In addition to climate change, the loss of mammals is fuelled by forest clearing and illegal hunting, especially with the help of wire snares, reported Andreas Wilting. Although rangers on behalf of conservation organisations remove wire snares again and again, the fight is rather hopeless in view of the estimated 13 million of these animal traps in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos alone. The great hunger for wild animal meat, especially in Asian cities, continues unabated and illegal hunting is still considered a trivial offence.

© Green Viet

Setting up a camera trap in Vietnam.

What else are the wildlife researchers planning? Andreas Wilting reports that an increasingly large-scale survey is one thing, but more speed is another: “We have to become faster. It often takes years from sampling to analysis. We need near-real-time recording of wildlife to be able to protect it better.”

Liebig Medal for Claudia Felser

Traditionally, the German Chemical Society awards its Liebig Memorial Medal for outstanding achievements in the entire field of chemistry at the GDNÄ meetings. This year it went to Professor Claudia Felser, Director at the Max Planck Institute for the Chemical Physics of Solids in Dresden. The chemist was honoured, among other things, for the design, synthesis and physical investigation of new quantum materials.

Three questions for Claudia Felser 

You are the first woman to receive the Liebig Medal alone. This award has existed for 117 years. What does that mean to you?
We need more women in the natural sciences and in academic leadership overall. It would be great to see more female colleagues as award winners soon. I am in favour of the American-style tenure track, which makes it possible to plan one’s career for the long term. My daughter, for example, is an engineer and is currently doing her doctorate in Germany. She’s not aiming for an academic career because she doesn’t want to move around so often. 

How did you get on your path?
I wasn’t actually supposed to go to Grammar School, my mother sent me to Realschule. But I was very good at maths and physics and then a teacher made sure I went to the Grammar School after all – in the eighth grade. At the new school there was a chemistry teacher who inspired me. He encouraged me to study chemistry and physics. But I didn’t think I could do that at the time, so I took a typical women’s detour and studied special education. What later helped me a lot was the great freedom I had in my research, my scientific focus on the border between physics and chemistry – and above all my fabulous mentors, to whom I am very grateful. 

What excites you about your research?
The fundamental and the applied, both. We do experiments with inorganic materials to discover completely new properties that could be useful, for example, to turn waste heat into electricity. Waste heat from cars, from houses or from power plants. We are also doing experiments that we expect to provide information about the origin of life and the universe.

Student programme: Science is challenged

Preparatory meetings since early summer ,intense discussions and finally agreement on three core topics: On the afternoon of the first day of the Assembly, participants of the Students’ Programme presented their questions to science, challenging three renowned scientists on the podium: biologist and Director of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Professor Antje Boetius, structural biologist and President-designate of the Max Planck Society, Patrick Cramer, and civil engineer, science manager and acatech President Jan Wörner.

© GDNÄ

Student presentation at the festive assembly with questions the team of scientists (in the picture on the right: Antje Boetius, Patrick Cramer and Jan Wörner).

Zoe Klee and Julius May, representing the Biology Team, kicked off the day. They wanted to know whether algae can be used to break down atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gases such as methane dissolved in seawater – and what methods might be used to optimise algae for this task. A lot of research is being done on this, said Antje Boetius, for example in Munich-Martinsried. However, the enzyme needed for this is not easy to use. “The chances that we can get plants to absorb more of our CO2 are not very high. It would be much better if we emitted less.” Patrick Cramer didn’t want to raise hopes for quick solutions either: “It’s not that simple with algae and their optimisation.” After all, he said, biomass is the great unknown in the climate system: “How much carbon is sequestered and where? We still can’t predict that in our models.”

© GDNÄ

Concert by the Albero Quartet at the evening buffet on the first day of the meeting.

The question posed by the medicine team – Yara Mshinsh and Elias Pantzier – was: “What do you think is necessary to be able to realise individualised medicine for every person in a timely manner?” There is still no truly individualised medicine, said Patrick Cramer: “So far, patients are divided into treatment groups, for example with the active substance Herceptin, which only benefits certain breast cancer patients.” The student followed up: “What can Max Planck Institutes contribute to advancing individualised medicine?” “We do basic research,” Patrick Cramer answered, “but if we have a technology with benefits for humanity, we like to develop that further, for example within the framework of Max Planck Innovation, a platform for spin-offs from research.” One example of success, he says, is a kinase inhibitor for cancer therapy. Cramer: “We are moving forward rapidly and are always discovering new principles that sometimes only benefit patients decades later.”

© GDNÄ

Astrophysicist Günther Hasinger explains his theory on the origin of dark matter.

Patricia Städtler and Janis Hofmann from the Urban Development team made a combative appearance: For the perfect city of tomorrow, they called for price-optimised housing, smooth and emission-free traffic, and an “absolute circular economy” that recycles scarce resources such as sand and concrete. “I warn against looking for the perfect city,” said Jan Wörner, recalling the many urban visions that were never realised. Instead of chasing a cloud cuckoo land, the engineer advised enabling the best possible city – “that should be our goal”. The city of the future, he said, must be flexible, cost-effective and, last but not least, safe. “The probability of the ceiling falling down here in the congress hall is not zero,” Wörner said, earning a laugh. Wood is not the universal solution for climate-friendly building, he stressed, and concrete is by no means dead. “Concrete has many faces, and one of them is nut chocolate: it, too, consists of a filler, chocolate, and an aggregate, nuts.” So cement is by no means the only concrete option, Wörner said, adding, “In the future, we’ll also be able to build structures from algae.” It is important to keep many technologies in mind, he said – “we have to keep an open mind.” 

At the end of the lively discussion, entertainingly moderated by GDNÄ President Professor Martin Lohse, Patrick Cramer wooed participants in the student programme: “In science, we need young people like you.” – On Friday, 9 September, research will be challenged again: through questions in the Biology session, moderated by the next GDNÄ President, Professor Heribert Hofer.

The 200th anniversary makes headlines

Whether broadcast, newspaper, websites or social media: the GDNÄ’s anniversary meeting is arousing the interest of journalists in the Leipzig region and far beyond. On this page we inform you about current contributions and provide background information.

In autumn 2023

Yearbook 2022 of the Leopoldina

In a 35-page article, Dr Michael Kaasch, scientific editor of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, reports in detail on the 200th anniversary of the GDNÄ and the Leopoldina lecture by Markus Gross “Computer Science for Hollywood Pictures”. The article contains a great deal of detailed information on the joint history of the GDNÄ and the Leopoldina. Concise quotations and extensive references round off the carefully prepared article.

>> Special print “The Society of German Natural Scientists and Physicians and the Leopoldina” (PDF, 1,24 MB)
>> Yearbook 2022 of the Leopoldina

In March 2023

„Leipziger Blätter“

The cultural magazine “Leipziger Blätter” reports in a three-page article („Zurück zu den Wurzeln“) on the 2022 Festversammlung, the history of the Society and its plans for the future. The special relationship of the GDNÄ to its founding city is a recurring theme.. The “Leipziger Blätter” are published by Passage-Verlag, which also published the commemorative publication for the 200th anniversary.

>> Article „Zurück zu den Wurzeln“ (PDF, 249 KB, German only)
>> Current issue of the cultural magazine “Leipziger Blätter”, published twice a year

In November 2022

„Naturwissenschaftliche Rundschau“

In two detailed articles, the organ journal of the GDNÄ, the Naturwissenschaftliche Rundschau, reports on the anniversary conference in Leipzig. Dr Klaus Rehfeld, editor and publisher of the journal until 2021, describes his impressions of the glittering opening with ceremonial lectures and discussion rounds. Professor Michael Dröscher, treasurer and secretary general of the GDNÄ, reviews the four-day assembly with all the names, presentations and facets.

>> Professor Michael Dröscher: Ein glanzvolles Fest der Wissenschaften (German only, PDF, 1,79 MB)
>> Dr. Klaus Rehfeld: Wissenschaft im Bild (German only, PDF, 3,73 MB)

In October 2022

Culture blog “Leipzig-Lese

Against the background of a panel discussion on the history of the GDNÄ, this interview is about Schelling’s and Hegel’s obsession with questions of chemistry. Saxon science journalist Dr Konrad Lindner and science historian and GDNÄ representative Professor Dietrich von Engelhardt exchange views on this.

In September 2022

Physics portal “pro-physik.de”

The leading German-language specialist portal for all areas of physics reports in detail on the anniversary celebration and the history of the GDNÄ.

>> GDNÄ: Offener Austausch für die Wissenschaft (German only)

Website of acatech – German Academy of Science and Engineering

Since 1822, the Society of German Natural Scientists and Physicians (GDNÄ) has brought together scientists, female scientists and those interested in science for interdisciplinary exchange. At the festive meeting marking the 200th anniversary of the society from September 8 to 11 in Leipzig, the focus was on various issues for the future. Acatech experts were also invited and discussed with the participants the possibilities of shaping technology, new forms of participation and the digital transformation in healthcare. (…more)

© acatech

Armin Grunwald, Karena Kalmbach and MDW (from left to right) at the acatech Science & Technology Café “What kind of world do we want to live in?”

Science blog of the Viennese “Standard”

In a vividly illustrated blog post peppered with many interesting details “Research in dialogue: Two centuries of meetings”, Thomas Hofmann highlights highlights of the GDNÄ meetings in Austria. Austria was a frequently visited conference venue, with Vienna in first place (1832, 1856, 1894, 1913, 1966), followed by Innsbruck (1869, 1924, 1978), Graz (1843, 1875) and Salzburg (1881, 1909). For example, Thomas Hofmann writes about the great Vienna Congress in 1913:

“The fourth congress in Vienna attracted more than 5,000 congress participants and congress attendees to the capital in September 1913. The city was all about the sciences. ‘One encounters them, now everywhere in the city, the German natural scientists and physicians, and one is pleased to meet them,’ wrote the feature writer Paul Zifferer in the Neue Freie Presse.”

Thomas Hofmann is head of the library, publishing house and archive of the Austrian Austrian Geological Survey.

© Wissenschaftsblog des Wiener „Standard“

Report about the student programme on MDR

In its news programme “Sachsenspiegel”, Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk (MDR), will broadcast a report on the GDNÄ students’ program on 8 September from 19:00. It shows how students at Leipzig’s Goethe Grammar School are preparing for their performance at the opening of the 200th anniversary celebrations. The camera crew also accompanies them to their presentation entitled “We only have one world” in the Congress Hall at Leipzig Zoo. The feature will be available in the media library for a week and also later on request.

© MDR

© GDNÄ

6 September 2022: Students on the day before the presentation “We only have one world” at the Kongresshalle am Zoo Leipzig.

Pictures and texts on Instagram

The GDNÄ’s own Instagram channel @gdnae.society provides current impressions of the conference events in Leipzig. The contributions come from a young team from Stuttgart Media University: Gloria Gamarnik, Lena Dagenbach and Maren Krämer, three students from the Crossmedia Editing/Public Relations course. The project is led by Dr. Alexander Mäder, science journalist and professor at the Media University. The focus of the reporting is the GDNÄ’s student program.

Assembly hashtag: #gdnae200

In August 2022

Kulturblog “Leipzig-Lese” on Lorenz Oken and the founding of the GDNÄ

In a detailed article, Saxon science journalist Dr Konrad Lindner deals with the founding history of the GDNÄ and its further development. The text, which appeared on the Leipzig-Lese portal, takes us through the contributions of Schelling, Oken, Oerstedt and Carus to Einstein and Heisenberg and to today’s Leipzig philosophers who have expressed their views on idealist-romantic natural philosophy and German idealism.

© Leipzig-Lese

Screenshot “Lorenz Oken rief Naturforscher und Ärzte für 1822 nach Leipzig”